Top 10 Results
2.NCAA loses Supreme Court case
1 day ago · PHOENIX – The Supreme Court ruled Monday that the NCAA’s attempts to limit education-related benefits for athletes violate antitrust law in a unanimous decision that could pave the way for further rulings on athlete compensation. The ruling means schools can go beyond tuition scholarships to cover cost of attendance, and pay for personal laptops, tutors.
3.NCAA loses Supreme Court case
1 day ago · The NCAA said the limits protect the amateur nature of college sports and preserve it as a distinct product. The NCAA argued a 1984 Supreme Court decision gave it …
4.NCAA loses Supreme Court case
2 days ago · NCAA Loses Supreme Court Case On Compensation June 21, 2021 Cronkite News Many former collegiate athletes, including former Corona del Sol and GCU standout Casey Benson, are appreciative of the Supreme Court ruling that that the NCAA can no longer enforce rules limiting education-related benefits.
5.NCAA loses Supreme Court case
1 day ago · The NCAA Lost A Major Supreme Court Case Over How Student-Athletes Are Compensated. While the NCAA can still restrict cash payments to players, the organization can no longer limit education-related benefits schools can give to them.
6.NCAA loses Supreme Court case
1 day ago · The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday against the NCAA in a dispute over what compensation schools can offer students who play for their sports teams, saying the college athletic association ...
7.NCAA loses Supreme Court case
1 day ago · The Supreme Court on Monday ruled against the NCAA in a landmark antitrust case that specifically challenged the association’s ability to have national limits on benefits for athletes that are ...
8.NCAA loses Supreme Court case
1 day ago · In a court case that has been going on for years, the Supreme Court ruled that the NCAA can’t set limits on benefits that pertain to academics for athletic scholarships.
1.Academic benefits a go: NCAA loses Supreme Court case on compensation
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that the NCAA’s attempts to limit education-related benefits for athletes violate antitrust ...
2.UGA athletes watch as NCAA loses in Supreme Court
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday sided with former college athletes in a dispute over National Collegiate Athletic Association rules which limit certain forms of compensation. In a unanimous ruling ...
3.NCAA could seek once-radical solutions after high court loss
Embedded in Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's scathing rebuke of the NCAA and its rules were a few suggestions on how ...
4.U.S. Supreme Court sides with former athletes in NCAA compensation case
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that NCAA limits on the education-related benefits that colleges can offer athletes who play ...
5.Supreme Court unanimously rules against NCAA in athlete compensation case
All nine justices ruled against the NCAA, opening the door for schools to provide education-based benefits for athletes.
6.Supreme Court sides with athletes in dispute with NCAA over rules limiting benefits
Supreme Court calls the NCAA a 'massive business' that enriches many, while paying its star athletes almost nothing.
1.Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
Association, No. 16-476, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The
2.National Collegiate Athletic Association
U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the NCAA was not subject to that law, without reviewing the merits of the discrimination claim. In 2007, the case of White
3.Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992
to petition the Supreme Court of the United States to hear the case. New Jersey appealed this case to the United States Supreme Court, requesting examination